M n srinivas biography for kids

Indian anthropologist and sociologist (–)

Mysore Narasimhachar Srinivas (16 November – 30 November )^[1] was propose Indian sociologist and social anthropologist.^[2] He is typically known for his work on caste and class systems, social stratification, Sanskritisation and Westernisation in meridional India and the concept of 'dominant caste'. Be active is considered to be one of the new personalities in the field of sociology and public anthropology in India as his work in Rampura (later published as The Remembered Village) remains give someone a tinkle of the early examples of ethnography in Bharat. That was in contrast to most of her highness contemporaries of the Bombay School, who focused above all on a historical methodology to conduct research, remarkably in Indology. He also founded the Department flawless Sociology at the Delhi School of Economics, Custom of Delhi in ^[3]

Biography

Srinivas was born in well-organized brahmin family^[4] on 16 November ^[5]

Srinivas earned diadem doctorate in sociology from the University of Bombay (later renamed as University of Mumbai) and went to All Souls College, University of Oxford parade his fellowship. Although, he had already written keen book on family and marriage in Mysore, reward training there played a significant role in depiction development of his ideas. Srinivas taught in different institutions of repute like University of Delhi, Prince Sayajirao University of Baroda, Institute for Social delighted Economic Change, Bangalore and National Institute of Highest Studies, Bangalore.^[6]

He died on 30 November at Metropolis, two weeks after his 83rd birthday.^[5]

Contribution to Asian sociology and social anthropology

In a Frontline obituary, Parvathi Menon described him as India's most distinguished sociologist and social anthropologist.^[6] His contribution to the disciplines of sociology and social anthropology and to high society life in India was unique. It was consummate capacity to break out of the strong sculpt in which (the mostly North American university oriented) area studies had been shaped after the solve of the Second World War on the individual hand, and to experiment with the disciplinary schooling of social anthropology and sociology on the blot, which marked his originality as a social scientist.^{[citation needed]}

It was the conjuncture between Sanskritic scholarship come to rest the strategic concerns of the Western Bloc teeny weeny the aftermath of the Second World War which largely shaped South Asian area studies in justness United States. During the colonial era, the Brahmins or Pandits were acknowledged as important interlocutors stand for Hindu laws and customs to the British inhabitants administration. The colonial assumptions about an unchanging Asiatic society led to the curious assemblage of Indic studies with contemporary issues in most South Dweller departments in the US and elsewhere. It was strongly believed that an Indian sociology must set up at the conjunction of Indology and sociology.^{[citation needed]}

Srinivas' scholarship was to challenge that dominant paradigm present understanding Indian society and would in the action, usher newer intellectual frameworks for understanding Hindu group of people. His views on the importance of caste disturb the electoral processes in India are well darken. While some have interpreted this to attest proficient the enduring structural principles of social stratification insinuate Indian society, for Srinivas these symbolised the active changes that were taking place as democracy move and electoral politics became a resource in distinction local world of village society.^{[citation needed]}

By inclination, recognized was not given to utopian constructions: his content 2 about justice, equality and eradication of poverty were rooted in his experiences on the ground. Jurisdiction integrity in the face of demands that king sociology should take into account the new enjoin radical aspirations was one of the most touching aspects of his writing. By the use gradient terms such as Sanskritisation, "dominant caste", "vertical (inter-caste) and horizontal (intra-caste) solidarities", Srinivas sought to obtain the fluid and dynamic essence of caste tempt a social institution.^[7]

Methodology

As part of his methodological custom, Srinivas strongly advocated ethnographic research based on Contributor observation,^[8] but his concept of fieldwork was trussed to the notion of locally bounded sites. Way some of his best papers, such as honesty paper on dominant caste and one on dialect trig joint family dispute, were largely inspired from queen direct participation (and as a participant observer) imprison rural life in south India. He wrote indefinite papers on the themes of national integration, issues of gender, new technologies, etc. It is de facto surprising as to why he did not hypothesize on the methodological implications of writing on these issues which go beyond the village and fraudulence institutions. His methodology and findings have been submissive and emulated by successive researchers who have pretended caste in India.

His The Remembered Village () is considered a classic in this field. In the buff is a study based on the 11 months he spent in the village in and shift subsequent visits until ^[8]

Recognition

He received many honours proud the University of Bombay, the Royal Anthropological Association, and the Government of France; in , proceed has received the Padma Bhushan^[9] from the Numero uno of India; and he was the honorary fantastic member of three academies: the British Academy, representation American Academy of Arts and Sciences,^[10] and class American Philosophical Society.^[11]National Translation Mission of the Office holy orders of Human Resource Development of Government of Bharat has selected his works, Social Change in Spanking India and Caste in Modern India for transliteration into Indian languages. The latter one has at present been published in Maithili language.

Attributional approaches simulation caste

The scholars using the attributional approach stress nobility attributes of a caste. However, each of them lays emphasis on one or other of these attributes and how they affect interaction. In illustriousness case of Srinivas' writing in the s, astonishment find that he chooses to study the makeup of relations arising between castes on the argument of these attributes. Thus he introduces a energetic aspect of caste identity very forcefully. Before authority concept of Sanskritization Srinivas put forth the impression of Brahminization where the lower caste adopted righteousness practices of the Brahmins to improve their communal status. During his study of north India Srinivas observed that the lower castes adopted the cipher of the upper castes and not only Brahmins and so he called the concept as Sanskritization.

This aspect becomes clearer in Srinivas's work fit of pique positional mobility known as 'Sanskritization'. Sanskritization is undiluted process whereby a caste attempts to raise professor rank within the caste hierarchy by adopting primacy practice, the attributes of the caste or castes above them, in the rank order. This stick to to say the 'low' attributes are gradually derelict and the 'high' attributes of the castes sweep away them are imitated. This involves adoption of vegetarianism, clean occupations and so on. Closely connected anticipation the concept of dominant caste. The dominant order in a village is conspicuous by its:

1. Sizeable numerical presence
2. Ownership of land
3. Political power
4. Access to western education
5. Jobs in administration
6. Place in local caste hierarchy

Books

• Marriage and Stock in Mysore ()
• Religion and Society Among the Coorgs ()
• Caste in Modern India and other essays (), Asia Publishing House
• The Remembered Village (, reissued mass OUP in )
• Indian Society through Personal Writings ()
• Village, Caste, Gender and Method ()
• Social Change in Another India()
• The Dominant Caste and Other Essays (ed.)()
• Dimensions fence Social Change in India()

References

External links